Novation Supernova 2 vs Ultranova: Synthesizers page 7 | Hispasonic
What can not be is that before 6.4 .. analog voices, costing muchos.Y "hard cuantro" veeboards which today cost a kidney were being made. Both uploaded material? We have to stick doblaa.
albertodream wrote: I Touch your eggs, so to do something with Ultranova multitimbral, I have to pass it to audio, make another part, pass it audio, and if properly, change the sound and pass it back to audio, and so with each track ... Very direct and immediate could have robbed the MIDI, overall, if we're wrong we can go editing the audio to go squaring, and even he could have removed the synth and get another keyboard controller: if I go to use the DAW as I get with virtual synths and latency between them equals Hey, but wanted to make a serious synth that responds to current market requirements. You know what my theory?? Until Supernova (including previous models), had a team of technicians who were designing majos computer to computer ... from there (go you know why), this group of technicians will leave you with Novation and change something (probably with new technical) ... ... Note that from there, came the K-station and Ks-rack, gossip who tried to stick to sound Novation, but were far from it (not even close to the same). And immediately the vision of equipment changed radically. They concentrated on drivers, and if you do gossip or depend on a computer to run decently or directly to fulfill its function.
walerandei wrote: You know what my theory?? Until Supernova (including previous models), had a team of technicians who were designing majos computer to computer ... from there (go you know why), this group of technicians will leave you with Novation and change something (probably with new technical) ... ... Note that from there, came the K-station and Ks-rack, gossip who tried to stick to sound Novation, but were far from it (not even close to the same). And immediately the vision of equipment changed radically. They concentrated on drivers, and if you do gossip or depend on a computer to run decently or directly to fulfill its function. Okay, focused on making controllers (and very good, by the way), but if they keep making instruments that employ technicians who make tools, veeboards non-technical marketers who try to justify not making a multitimbral synth saying more or less "is not fashionable" Roland has made a similar crap with the new Juno Gi: worldwide pensaía supposedly it is the evolution of the Juno G, well you have 8-track recorder (the G already had 4 stereo), a multi-effects to the Boss GT, SD cards, USB host and have doubled the wave memory (64 to 128 MB), but they have removed the MIDI sequencer! Of course they have poured their reviews and some forums makers Roland justified 1st saying that while Juno Gi is called veeboards is not the evolution of the Juno G (they call him Juno F, cohones!) And 2nd (similar to Novation way) that already comes with a CD with the synth Cakewalk LE with what sequence it can very well the computer, and if you want to record what you can do in audio. Come on, we have lacked tell them "that MIDI is not fashionable." And I say, if I have to use the computer to sequence it and burn it: what the fuck I want a hardware veeboards synth with synth tremendous VST out there (including many of the free mean on the ear more than one of these VA ). Well, I've already vented
"Multi-timbrality is desirable, but it is not a necessity These Days. DAWs Now that have matured and audio recording to disk is the norm, multi-timbral synths veeboards are a luxury rather than a necessity.". What the fuck have, it will have been as wide ... Shame! A force apparently seen and we forget and we will use VST synths, S, seeing what companies offer and what they cost synths veeboards not going to be no choice. Shame.
OKTEK wrote: "Multi-timbrality is desirable, but it is not a necessity These Days Now that DAWs have matured and audio recording to disk is the norm, multi-timbral synths are a luxury rather than a necessity..." What the fuck have, it will have been as wide ... Shame! A force apparently seen and we forget and we will use VST synths, S, seeing what companies offer and what they cost synths not going to be no choice. Shame. Lets give it up the ass ... What you need to do is seize the moment, and instead of investing money in these pimps or software veeboards ... must be made with "serious" veeboards synths while remaining in the market segundamano. So when the time comes in which drought predominate toys ... we are so comfortable
What can not be is that before 6.4 .. analog voices, costing muchos.Y "hard cuantro" veeboards which today cost a kidney were being made. Both uploaded material? We have to stick doblaa.
albertodream wrote: I Touch your eggs, so to do something with Ultranova multitimbral, I have to pass it to audio, make another part, pass it audio, and if properly, change the sound and pass it back to audio, and so with each track ... Very direct and immediate could have robbed the MIDI, overall, if we're wrong we can go editing the audio to go squaring, and even he could have removed the synth and get another keyboard controller: if I go to use the DAW as I get with virtual synths and latency between them equals Hey, but wanted to make a serious synth that responds to current market requirements. You know what my theory?? Until Supernova (including previous models), had a team of technicians who were designing majos computer to computer ... from there (go you know why), this group of technicians will leave you with Novation and change something (probably with new technical) ... ... Note that from there, came the K-station and Ks-rack, gossip who tried to stick to sound Novation, but were far from it (not even close to the same). And immediately the vision of equipment changed radically. They concentrated on drivers, and if you do gossip or depend on a computer to run decently or directly to fulfill its function.
walerandei wrote: You know what my theory?? Until Supernova (including previous models), had a team of technicians who were designing majos computer to computer ... from there (go you know why), this group of technicians will leave you with Novation and change something (probably with new technical) ... ... Note that from there, came the K-station and Ks-rack, gossip who tried to stick to sound Novation, but were far from it (not even close to the same). And immediately the vision of equipment changed radically. They concentrated on drivers, and if you do gossip or depend on a computer to run decently or directly to fulfill its function. Okay, focused on making controllers (and very good, by the way), but if they keep making instruments that employ technicians who make tools, veeboards non-technical marketers who try to justify not making a multitimbral synth saying more or less "is not fashionable" Roland has made a similar crap with the new Juno Gi: worldwide pensaía supposedly it is the evolution of the Juno G, well you have 8-track recorder (the G already had 4 stereo), a multi-effects to the Boss GT, SD cards, USB host and have doubled the wave memory (64 to 128 MB), but they have removed the MIDI sequencer! Of course they have poured their reviews and some forums makers Roland justified 1st saying that while Juno Gi is called veeboards is not the evolution of the Juno G (they call him Juno F, cohones!) And 2nd (similar to Novation way) that already comes with a CD with the synth Cakewalk LE with what sequence it can very well the computer, and if you want to record what you can do in audio. Come on, we have lacked tell them "that MIDI is not fashionable." And I say, if I have to use the computer to sequence it and burn it: what the fuck I want a hardware veeboards synth with synth tremendous VST out there (including many of the free mean on the ear more than one of these VA ). Well, I've already vented
"Multi-timbrality is desirable, but it is not a necessity These Days. DAWs Now that have matured and audio recording to disk is the norm, multi-timbral synths veeboards are a luxury rather than a necessity.". What the fuck have, it will have been as wide ... Shame! A force apparently seen and we forget and we will use VST synths, S, seeing what companies offer and what they cost synths veeboards not going to be no choice. Shame.
OKTEK wrote: "Multi-timbrality is desirable, but it is not a necessity These Days Now that DAWs have matured and audio recording to disk is the norm, multi-timbral synths are a luxury rather than a necessity..." What the fuck have, it will have been as wide ... Shame! A force apparently seen and we forget and we will use VST synths, S, seeing what companies offer and what they cost synths not going to be no choice. Shame. Lets give it up the ass ... What you need to do is seize the moment, and instead of investing money in these pimps or software veeboards ... must be made with "serious" veeboards synths while remaining in the market segundamano. So when the time comes in which drought predominate toys ... we are so comfortable
No comments:
Post a Comment